What is the Trust Fund Doctrine? - ALBURO ALBURO AND ASSOCIATES LAW OFFICES (2024)

What is the Trust Fund Doctrine? - ALBURO ALBURO AND ASSOCIATES LAW OFFICES (1)

Photo fromUnsplash | Alex Shute

The following post does not create a lawyer-client relationship between Alburo Alburo and Associates Law Offices (or any of its lawyers) and the reader. It is still best for you to engage the services of a lawyer or you may directly contact and consult Alburo Alburo and Associates Law Offices to address your specific legal concerns, if there is any.

Also, the matters contained in the following were written in accordance with the law, rules, and jurisprudence prevailing at the time of writing and posting, and do not include any future developments on the subject matter under discussion.

AT A GLANCE:

The trust fund doctrine provides that the capital stock, property and other assets of a corporation are regarded as equity in trust for the payment of corporate creditor (Philip Turner v. Lorenzo Shipping Corporation, G.R. 157479, 2010)

The Trust Fund doctrine was for the first time announced in the year 1824 by Judge Story in the well-known case of Wood v. Dummer (3 Mason 309). In that case, the stockholders of a bank without paying its debts, had divided among themselves all the property of the corporation. Manifestly, a great injustice had been done to the creditors and on some theory or other they must be allowed to recover their claims from the persons who had so received the property of the corporation.

Apparently, Judge Story thought that none of the principles of law applicable to the ordinary relation of debtor and creditor were adequate to the situation. The stockholders did not owe the debt and how, therefore, could the creditor compel them to pay? If, however, the property of the company be regarded as a fund held by the corporation in trust for its creditors, then the difficulty was overcome, for trust property could be followed into the hands of persons who have notice of the trust. As Judge Story said:

“If I am right in this position, the principle difficulty in the cause is overcome. If the capital stock is a trust fund, then it may be followed into the hands of any persons having notice of the trust attaching to it.”

As this new theory was so convenient to resolution of this case, Judge Story proceeded to show that the property of a corporation was a fund held in trust by it for its creditors.

The law says –

Presently, under Section 139 of the Revised Corporation Code, it provides that no corporation shall distribute any of its assets or property except upon lawful dissolution and after payment of all its debts and liabilities.

Jurisprudence says –

As to scope, the trust fund doctrine is not limited to reaching the stockholder’s unpaid subscriptions. The scope of the doctrine when the corporation is insolvent encompasses not only the capital stock, but also other property and assets generally regarded in equity as a trust fund for the payment of corporate debts. All assets and property belonging to the corporation held in trust for the benefit of creditors that were distributed or in the possession of the stockholders, regardless of full payment of their subscriptions, may be reached by the creditor in satisfaction of its claim.

Also, under the trust fund doctrine, a corporation has no legal capacity to release an original subscriber to its capital stock from the obligation of paying for his shares, in whole or in part, without a valuable consideration, or fraudulently, to the prejudice of creditors. The creditor is allowed to maintain an action upon any unpaid subscriptions and thereby steps into the shoes of the corporation for the satisfaction of its debt. To make out a prima facie case in a suit against stockholders of an insolvent corporation to compel them to contribute to the payment of its debts by making good unpaid balances upon their subscriptions, it is only necessary to establish that the stockholders have not in good faith paid the par value of the stocks of the corporation.

(Philip Turner v. Lorenzo Shipping Corporation, G.R. 157479, November 24, 2010, JENNIFER M. ENANO-BOTE VS. JOSE CH. ALVAREZ et.al, G.R. No. 223572. November 10, 2020)

Related article: WHAT IS A TRUST FUND UNDER THE PRE-NEED CODE OF THE PHILIPPINES?

Alburo Alburo and Associates Law Offices specializes in business law and labor law consulting. For inquiries regarding taxation and taxpayer’s remedies, you may reach us at info@alburolaw.com, or dial us at (02)7745-4391/0917-5772207.

All rights reserved.

0 Shares

What is the Trust Fund Doctrine? - ALBURO ALBURO AND ASSOCIATES LAW OFFICES (2024)

FAQs

What is the Trust Fund Doctrine? - ALBURO ALBURO AND ASSOCIATES LAW OFFICES? ›

All assets and property belonging to the corporation held in trust for the benefit of creditors that were distributed or in the possession of the stockholders, regardless of full payment of their subscriptions, may be reached by the creditor in satisfaction of its claim.

What is the trust fund doctrine? ›

The trust-fund doctrine is a rule that says when a company goes bankrupt, all the things it owns, including the money people paid to buy its stock, are held in a special fund. This fund is used to pay back the company's creditors, the people it owes money to.

What is the trust fund doctrine for liability for watered stocks? ›

(c)Trust fund doctrine for liability for watered stocks – Capital stock, inclusive of unpaid subscription, is a trust fund which the creditors have the right to look up to for the satisfaction of their claims.

How do you get money out of a trust fund? ›

Approaching the Trustee

Another possible way to get money out of a trust fund is to request a cash withdrawal. This would require putting the request in writing and sending it to the trustee. The trustee might agree. But that individual or entity must also fulfill their fiduciary obligations.

How do trust funds pay out for beneficiaries? ›

After their passing, the trustee can pass on the assets to the beneficiary(s) as per the grantor's instructions, whether that's through a regular income stream or a lump sum payment.

Are shareholders liable for watered stock? ›

When stocks became 'watered' through these exchanges, the individuals involved could be held liable for the difference between the par value and the assets and potentially other charges.

What are the disadvantages of watered stocks? ›

Disadvantages of watered stock
  • The unknowing owners of the watered stocks are held responsible for the lenders' funds during the deception's exposure.
  • In a market distorted by watered stocks, novice or inexperienced investors frequently fail as they are unable to conduct a thorough study and get concrete facts.

Who is liable for the issuance of watered share? ›

If creditors foreclosed on the company's assets, the holders of watered stock could be held liable for the difference between the company's value on the books and its value in terms of real property and assets.

What is the Public Trust Doctrine simplified? ›

Public trust doctrine is a legal principle establishing that certain natural and cultural resources are preserved for public use. Natural resources held in trust can include navigable waters, wildlife, or land.

Can a trustee spend the money in a trust fund? ›

If a trustee uses the funds from a trust account for their benefit, they will violate their fiduciary duty, resulting in severe consequences. Ultimately, trustees can only withdraw money from a trust account for specific expenses within certain limitations. Their duties require them to comply with the grantor's wishes.

What is the doctrine of secret trust? ›

A secret trust arises where a person who has made a will (the testator) leaves a gift to someone in their will but intends that the recipient (the secret trustee) holds it to make a gift on to another person (the beneficiary).

What are the disadvantages of a trust account? ›

What Are the Disadvantages of a Trust in California? Trusts are costly to create. Creating a trust without an attorney may be less expensive, but doing so leaves the trust much more vulnerable to trust contests and other legal litigation. It is also more time-consuming to properly set up a trust than to create a will.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Neely Ledner

Last Updated:

Views: 6175

Rating: 4.1 / 5 (62 voted)

Reviews: 93% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Neely Ledner

Birthday: 1998-06-09

Address: 443 Barrows Terrace, New Jodyberg, CO 57462-5329

Phone: +2433516856029

Job: Central Legal Facilitator

Hobby: Backpacking, Jogging, Magic, Driving, Macrame, Embroidery, Foraging

Introduction: My name is Neely Ledner, I am a bright, determined, beautiful, adventurous, adventurous, spotless, calm person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.